Zulfiya Tarazova. Theory and Method
for Media Technology.
Theme 3: Research and theory (before)
Reference: Brad J.
Bushman, Patrick E. Jamieson, Ilana Weitz, Daniel Romer (2013) Gun Violence
Trends in Movies, Pediatrics, Vol 132, 1014-1019.
For preparing my
third lecture I have taken science article from journal “Pediatrics” – “Gun
Violence Trends in Movies”. “Pediatrics” is an official peer-reviewed journal
of the American Academy of Pediatrics. The content of the journal is intended
to encompass the needs of the whole child in his physiologic, mental,
emotional, and social structure. Original research and clinical observations
are published in this journal. Contributions pertinent to
pediatrics are also included from related fields such as surgery, public
health, human genetics, basic sciences, psychology, psychiatry, education,
sociology. Impact Factor: 5.297 (2013). Total 2012 Citations: 61,542.
“Pediatrics” is among the top 2% most-cited scientific and medical journals.
“Pediatrics” has the second highest impact factor, second highest 5-year impact
factor, and highest total citations among all journals in the field of
pediatrics.
For analyze I have
taken research of the professor Brad Bushman of Ohio University (USA) and his
group. Brad Bushman is a famous specialist on the impact of mass media on the
child's psyche. In previous publications he described a positive correlation
between television viewing and the level of violent crimes committed by
juveniles, and also pointed on a number of personality traits of juvenile
offenders. Authors of research “Gun Violence Trends in Movies” assume that the
amount of gun violence shown in PG-13 films has more than tripled since 1985,
the year the rating was introduced. Study reveals that the most popular PG-13
movies of 2011 and 2012 showed significantly more gun violence than R-rated
movies of the same time period. PG-13–rated films are among the top-selling
films and are especially attractive to youth.
About method. Researchers have used trained coders, which
identified the presence of violence in each 5-minute film segment for one-half
of the top 30 films since 1950 and the presence of guns in violent segments
since 1985, the first full year the PG-13 rating (age 13+) was used.
Scientists
considered "the scene of violence with weapons," all the moments when
the hero, holding in the hand a gun, firing at the enemy alive. Hunting and
sport shooting were excluded: according to authors, hunting and sport shooting
can’t be called “violence”. Bushman and his colleagues are not reported about the
scenes where can be use lasers and other fantastic designs weapon against
robots or other known inanimate enemy.
Results found that violence in films has more than doubled
since 1950, and gun violence in PG-13–rated films has more than tripled since
1985. When the PG-13 rating was introduced, these films contained about as much
gun violence as G (general audiences) and PG (parental guidance suggested for
young children) films. Since 2009, PG-13–rated films have contained as much or
more violence as R-rated films (age 17+) films.
Authors of the
study came to the conclusion that even if youth do not use guns, these findings
suggest that they are exposed to increasing gun violence in top-selling films.
By including guns in violent scenes, film producers may be strengthening the
weapons effect and providing youth with scripts for using guns. These findings
are concerning because many scientific studies have shown that violent films
can increase aggression. Violent films are also now easily accessible to youth
(eg, on the Internet and cable). This research suggests that the presence of
weapons in films might amplify the effects of violent films on aggression.
I guess that it is
an interesting study, because it has proved that mass media has a big influence
on the human’s consciousness, especially on the children and adolescents.
Authors of research have used methods of quantitative research, which show the
increasing of the amount of gun in movies for child.
I think that in
this research we can see some thesis from the two-step flow of communication or
Multistep Flow Model, which was created by famous sociologist P. Lasarsfeld.
This theory says that most people form their opinions under the influence of
opinion leaders, who in turn are influenced by the mass media. According to
this model, ideas flow from mass media to opinion leaders, and from them to a
wider population. If we take some movies and their heroes, we will see that
they show model of behavior to the child and inculcate aggressive habits to the
child. I guess, that heroes of movies can be leaders of opinion in that case. The
directors of these films can also be regarded as "opinion leaders"
that promote aggression and using of force.
Also we can consider this research from semiotic theory, where the gun can be consider like a sign of demonstration of the
force, power. This research also has proved that modern media industry creates on the human's consciousness the image of the enemy, which can attack and we need to be able to handle a weapon in every situation in order to save our life.
Theory is a set of statements or principles devised to
explain a group of facts or phenomena, especially one that has been repeatedly
tested or is widely accepted and can be used to make predictions about some
phenomena.

Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий