My
comments:
1).
Theme 1. Anna Evaldsson
My
comments:
Hi, dear Anna! Thank you for the honest article. For
me it was also difficult to read Kant's and Plato's book so a lot. I think that
in the seminar the lector tried to explain ideas of philosopher precisely, so
it was easier to understand them with professor's explanation.
2).
Theme 2. Anna Evaldsson
My
comments:
Hi, Anna! This was a good recap from the lecture and
seminar, but I have a question: the lector assumed that we should consider
these articles of Benjamin, Adorno and Horkheimer in the contents of the time
where they lived, so they were very actual in that time. What do you think,
these ideas still actual today or not?
3). Theme 2. Isaac
Rondon Sosa
My
comments:
Hi, Isaac! Thank you for an interesting blog post!
You have written what according Adorno and Horkheimer
"the art produced in the industrial culture is not what is known as art,
but are now mere products of capitalism". I think that this idea is actual
today, what do you think? Are you agree or not with these philosophers?
Thank you!
4).
Theme 3. Ma XuXiao
My
comments:
Hi, Ma XuXiao!
Thank you for an interesting blog post! It was useful
to read about Computer Vision and Image Understanding. You have written that
this research corresponds with explanation theory and there researchers didn't
use different kinds of method. How you can improve this research and which kind
of method you could add?
Keep up the good work!
Zulfiya
5).
Theme 4 after blog Mikaela Wahlstedt
My
comments:
Hi, Mikaela Wahlstedt!
I really like your reflections about seminar and the
paper that you done. So I want to ask you have some ideas how the author of
paper "Students Perceptions of E-Mail Interaction During Student" can
improve their research?
6). Theme 4.
Erik_rosberg
My
comments:
Hi, Eric! It was interesting to read a summary about
workshop. I have a question for you. Participants of research usually face with
close and open questions during some tests or questionnaire. What kind of
questions do you prefer? And how do you think open and closed question
influence on the responses of participants?
Thank you!
7).
Theme 5. Andreas Almqvist Gref
My
comments:
Hi, Andreas! I like your ideas about appearance ideas
suddenly! How you came to this conclusion, can you tell about some interesting
experience about this?
8). Theme 5. Isaac
Rondon Sosa
My
comments:
Hi, Isaac! Your post is very useful and detailed. It
really helps me to understand some details that I could miss during my
preparation to the lecture.
9). Theme 6 Erik_rosberg
My
comment:
Hi, Eric! I have read your post and I have few
questions. Firstly, the case study is a very complex and interesting method, do
you think is it real to take this volume of method for one researcher?
And secondly, if you have the opportunity which kind
of case from life you would take in order to investigate?
10). Theme 6: Qualitative and case study research;
Panagiotis K
My
comments:
Hi, Panagiotis! Thank you for an interesting blog
post! To reading it was very useful for me because I don't know that the case
studies method has to answer is of the "who", "what",
"where", "how" and "why". I think it likes in the
journalistic article, when author should answer on the same five questions :)
Now I see that my discussions on the seminar are different from you)
Comments of my groupmates and my answers:
Theme
1: Theory of knowledge and theory of science (after)
Anna
Maria:
Late comments for theme 1:
I find your statement about humans and their organs to
be interesting. You say that we don’t have any organs for perception of being,
identity etc., but that only our souls can understand this. Can we perhaps say
that the soul could be considered an “organ”? People sometimes talk about a
“sixth sense”. Maybe our soul or our mind is a way of describing that sixth
sense of knowledge (or we could call it an additional organ)?
Zulfiya
Tarazova:
Dear Anna, thank you for your comments! I guess that
we should discriminate this terms "soul" through religion and science
aspects. According to religion "soul" is a something that we received
from God, according to science our soul is a mind, it is our capacity to love,
to think and etc. So let's consider philosophy through the aspect of science.
Our soul is not organ, it is a capacity of our brain to recognize and analyze
everything that happens around us. "The sixth sense", which you have
described, I guess it is also a capacity of human organs to perceive the world
in high level.
Theme
3: Research and theory (after)
Sofia
Sjöberg:
Hi,
It’s very interesting to read about your comparison
between knowledge and theory, we didn’t discuss that much in my seminar. You
write that knowledge is a “unit of measurement of theory. Do you think that
knowledge only is facts, evidence and conclusions or that knowledge can be more
abstract and non-measurable? We talked about that there are different kinds of
theories and for example that human rights or feminism are theories, to you
think human rights also is some kind of knowledge?
Zulfiya
Tarazova:
Hi, Sofia!
Thank you for your comments!
I think that all kinds of information can be
knowledge. I don't think that human rights or feminism we can consider like a
theory because these objects we can mention like a system of opinion,
conclusions. Consideration them through theories like to compare cells of human
body(biology area) and the atom (physics). They are not comparable.
Panagiotis:
Hey Zulfiya!
Very nice reflection you have. And you came to a very
interesting conclusion with your seminar group. The thing is sometimes to get a
theoretical knowledge about the existing theories takes time for the researcher
and thus the research can have a big delay. But, I agree that everyone, before
starting anything, has to get the necessary theoretical knowledge to continue
with the practical stuff of his/her research.
Zulfiya
Tarazova:
Hi, Panagiotis!
Thank you for your comments!
Theme
5 - Design Research (after-2)
erik_rosberg:
Hi Zulfiia
This was a good recap from the lecture but I have a
question:What did you know before you went to the lecture and what did you
learn during the lecture? It would be fun to hear that.
I found it a bit confusing when Haibo said that big
ideas and great ideas are ideas that generate money, like you wrote. But surely
there are ideas that doesnt generate money and still are good ideas. Do you
agree?
Zulfiya
Tarazova:
Hi, Eric! Of course I agree with you that we have a
lot of ideas that include taking not only money, for example, charity,
volunteering. If you consider history of great project like
"Facebook", we will see that initially it was not born like a
commercial project.
About my knowledge that I got on the lecture: I think
it was more observable lecture than some lessons that give a lot of new
knowledge.
Theme
6: Qualitative and case study research (after)
Hannah
Bylund:
Hey!
It seems like you have grasped this week's theme very
well. It is very interesting to read different blogposts about theme 6 because
everyone writes different examples that Leif brought up during the seminar. At
our seminar he brought up the case of the disease ADHD and that you can
investigate it through several different views and use several different
methods as well! Interesting that you need a "specific" amount of
materials for it to become a case-study, but then I guess, because a case-study
investigates a phenomenon more thoroughly, you will probably need a big amount
of data from different kinds of studies :) Good job!
Zulfiya
Tarazova:
Hi, Hannah!
Thank you for your comment)
Charlotte:
Hi!
Nice reflection!
To further describe the concept of case studies I can
ad what I think was Leif´s main two things that define a case study.
Firstly, it is important to have a specific scenario
or a limited research area to perform a case study at. You can use one or
several scenarios to perform the case study at. Secondly, a case study is
defined by its method. A case study consists of a number of different methods.
It can be both qualitative and quantitative methods, only qualitative methods or
only quantitative methods.
Hopefully I contributed with some information about
what I perceive as a case study.
Zulfiya
Tarazova:
Hi, Charlotte! Thank you for additional information.
Specific scenario and special the case studies methods are really important
themes in the definition of "case study".
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий